01 / Litigation Technology & Information Architecture
The capability existed. The usable information system didn’t.
Patterson Buchanan Fobes & Leitch
View case studyUse existing capability
- Situation
- A litigation technology platform held the needed capability, but legacy records remained difficult to recognize, compare, and retrieve.
- Friction
- Source identifiers and incomplete contextual metadata preserved provenance, but did not tell people what a record was without opening it.
- What changed
- Debra developed a repeatable information-architecture method using metadata, retrieval structure, naming, and documentation. Records became more recognizable and findable while source identity remained intact within the existing platform.
- What this demonstrates
- A new tool is not always the answer. Sometimes the work is building the system that lets people use existing capability effectively.
Completely fictional illustrative example
Before / opaque identifiers
- ABCXYZ_1234
- ABCXYZ_4321
- ABCXYZ_2413
After / recognizable information
- 2010-01-24 - ABC v XYZ - Complaint
- 2010-01-24 - ABC v XYZ - Amended Complaint
- Letter - Smith - Doe - ABC v XYZ - Statement of Representation - 2010-01-24

